United States v. Herman Phillip Sheets, Jr.

Good Law
101 F.3d 706·1996 WL 665129·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39631
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 199695-50463California1,596 words

Opinion

Opinion

101 F.3d 706 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman Phillip SHEETS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50463. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. Decided Nov. 15, 1996. 1 Before: BRUNETTI, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * I. OVERVIEW 3 Defendant Herman Phillip Sheets, Jr. ("Sheets") appeals his jury conviction and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, and an armed career criminal in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g)(1), 924(a) & (e)(1). We affirm. II. DISCUSSION A. Admissibility of the Police Reports 4 The district court did not err in excluding police reports containing statements made by Ingram, Jordan, Vierra, Gugel and Gill. 1 Sheets asserts four grounds for admission of the reports: (1) the past recollection recorded exception to the hearsay rule; (2) the catchall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.