Carlwig

Carlwig v. Carlwig

Bad Law
16 F. Supp. 3d 1075·2014 WL 1571274·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54078
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 17, 2014Case No. 2:14-cv-1506-ODW(SHx)California8,814 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wright, J.

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RETURN OF CHILDREN TO SWEDEN [1, 3]

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is a discrete area of international law that presents a rare instance where a federal district court must dip its toes into the waters of family law. Petitioner Andreas Carlwig is seeking the expedited return of his two minor children to Sweden pursuant to the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, done at the Hague on October 25, 1980 (the “Convention”), and its implementing legislation, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 11601-11 . Respondent Sar-odjiny Carlwig is the children’s mother and the wife of Petitioner. She is currently in Los Angeles with the couple’s two children. While the Court must make a foray into family law to adjudicate the Petition, the Court notes that this is not a child custody proceeding. The Court’s role is limited to determining where child custody proceedings should be held — the U.S. or Sweden. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Petition and ORDERS the return of A.L.C. and E.R.S.C. to Sweden for custody proceedings. (ECF Nos. 1, 3.)

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On February 27,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.