Manier

Manier v. Medtech Products, Inc.

Good Law
29 F. Supp. 3d 1284·2014 WL 2919304·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87959
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 2014Case No. 14cv209-GPC(NLS)California1,824 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curiel, J.

*1286 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY REMAND ORDER PENDING APPEAL [Dkt. No. 18.]

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay remand order pending appeal. (Dkt. No. 18.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition and Defendants replied. (Dkt. Nos. 20, 21.) After a review of the briefing and applicable law, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion to stay remand order pending appeal.

Procedural Background

Plaintiffs Sharon Manier, Teri Spano and Heather Stanfield (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this putative class action alleging Defendants Medtech Products, Inc. and Prestige Brands, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) falsely and/or deceptively advertised their homeopathic ear relief product, Murine Ear Drops for Earache Relief in California in San Diego Superior Court. (Dkt. No. 1-1.) Plaintiffs allege Defendants violated the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ.Code § 1750 et seq. (“CLRA”); the Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code. § 17200 et seq. (“UCL”), the False Advertising Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof-Code § 17500 et seq. (“FAL”), and breached express and implied warranties of merchantability. (See Dkt. No. 1-1, Compl.)

On January 31, 2014, Defendants filed a Notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.