Beaver

Beaver v. Tarsadia Hotels

Good Law
29 F. Supp. 3d 1294·2014 WL 3002297·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90600
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 2014No. 11CV1842-GPC (KSC)California12,865 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curiel, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; AND GRANTING TARSADIA DEFENDANTS’ AND PLAYGROUND’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE NEGLIGENCE CAUSE OF ACTION

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ 1 motion for reconsideration of two rulings in the Court’s order filed on October 16, 2013. (Dkt. No. 133.) In that order, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment based on the “unlawful” prong of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and granted Tarsadia Defendants 2 and Defendant Playground Destination Properties, Inc.’s (“Playground”) motions for summary judgment as to all *1301 causes of action 3 except the negligence cause of action. (Dkt. No. 128.) On November 12, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an amended motion for reconsideration. (Dkt. No. 138.) Tarsadia Defendants and Playground filed their oppositions on March 7, 2014. (Dkt. Nos. 146, 147.) A reply was' filed on March 14, 2014. (Dkt. No. 148.)

In the Court’s order on the parties’ motions for summary judgment, the Court requested supplemental briefing on the negligence cause of action. (Dkt. No. 128.) Pursuant to the Court’s direction, the par- ‘ ties filed supplemental briefs on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.