Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc. v. BTL Industries, Inc.

Good Law
32 F. Supp. 3d 1088·2014 WL 1245222·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40402
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2014Case No. 13-cv-05473-JCS; Dkt. No. 18California7,536 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Spero, J.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc. (“Zeltiq”) filed this action against Defendants BTL Industries, Inc. . and Saturn Consulting LLC dba Monarch Laser Services (“Defendants”). Zeltiq alleges that Defendants falsely advertised that a medical device manufactured by BTL was approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to be used for fat reduction and body contouring. Zeltiq asserts claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 , and claims for unfair competition under California’s Business and Professional Code § 17200 and Massachusetts General Laws ch. 93A § 2. Zeltiq filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on March 14, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. For the reasons explained below, the Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED.

II. BACKGROUND

A. FDA’s Premarket Approval and 510(k) Clearance

In 1976, Congress amended the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), *1092 which previously only regulated food and drugs, with the Medical Device Amendments (“MDA”), 90 Stat. 539 , 21 U.S.C. § 301 . The MDA “classifies medical devices in three categories based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.