Maldonado

United States v. Maldonado

Good Law
33 F. Supp. 3d 1178·2014 WL 3573407·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98043
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2014Case No. 14-CR-1232-LCalifornia5,266 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lorenz, J.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT [ECF No. 15.]

. Defendant is charged in a one-count indictment with attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) and (b). Defendant has been physically removed from the United States pursuant to reinstatement of a previous order granting voluntary departure, and ordering deportation in the alternative. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Indictment on the basis that there is no valid order of removal upon which the government may base its prosecution. .(Doc. 15.)

Defendant contends: 1) that the reinstatement of an order granting voluntary departure cannot serve as a valid removal order within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. *1182 § 1326 , and that as a result the 2012 reinstatement order referenced in the indictment is invalid; 2) that the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) never advised him during the 1986 removal proceedings of suspension from deportation or registry, thereby violating his due process rights and invalidating the deportation order; and 3) that the INS violated Mr. Maldonado’s due process rights by recommending the denial of his initial naturalization petition, by failing to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.