Doe

Doe v. City of San Diego

Good Law
35 F. Supp. 3d 1214·2014 WL 3893045·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88079
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2014Case No. 12-CV-689-MMA-DHBCalifornia7,427 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Anello, J.

ORDER GRANTING SUPERVISOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 191]

This case arises out of the tortious conduct of former San Diego Police Officer *1219 Anthony Arevalos. In response to Areva-los’ acts, Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Plaintiff’ or “Doe”) filed suit against Defendants City of San Diego (the “City”), Arevalos, and nine of Arevalos’ past supervisors 1 in the San Diego Police Department (the “Supervisor Defendants”). In the present motion, the Supervisor Defendants seek summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims asserted against them. . [Doc. No. 191.] Upon consideration of the comprehensive record before the Court, including the written and oral arguments of counsel, the Court GRANTS the Supervisor Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Background

The facts surrounding the encounter between Jane Doe and Officer Arevalos have been thoroughly recited by this Court in previous orders and need not be repeated here. Instead, the Court focuses its attention on the facts involving the Supervisor Defendants.

Jane Doe was not Anthony Arevalos’ only victim. Rather, beginning in the late 1990’s, Arevalos was allegedly involved in a number of other sexually-laced…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.