EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Good Law
36 F. Supp. 3d 912·2014 WL 1308743·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45728
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 2014Case No. 12-cv-01011-JSTCalifornia7,299 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tigar, J.

Re: ECF No. 924.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

In this patent infringement action involving ‘Wireless Modem” Patent No. 5,592,491 (“the '491 Patent”), Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), Sprint Spectrum L.P. (“Sprint”), HTC America, Inc. (“HTC”), United States Cellular Corporation (“U.S.Cellular”), Motorola Mobility LLC, and Motorola Solutions, Inc. (collectively, “Motorola”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have moved for nummary judgment of noninfringement. The matter came for hearing on March 13, 2014.

The '491 Patentee invented a system, and a set of methods, through which subscriber units respond to the unavailability of a cellular connection by transferring instead to a connection through a modem. But the accused networks do not do that. In the accused networks, cellular phones transfer to a modem-based Wi-Fi connection whenever there is a Wi-Fi connection, regardless of whether there is or is not an available cellular connection. Accordingly, and for other reasons set forth more fully herein, Defendants are entitled to summary judgment of noninfringement of all asserted claims.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.