France Telecom S.A. v. Marvell Semiconductor Inc.

Good Law
39 F. Supp. 3d 1080·2014 WL 1478850·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52564
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 2014Case No. 12-cv-04967-WHOCalifornia11,539 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Orrick, J.

ORDER ON MARVELL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 137

Defendant Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (“Marvell”), moves for summary judgment that U.S. Patent 5,446,747 (“the '747 Patent”) is invalid because Claims 1 and 10 are merely mathematical algorithms or abstract ideas, and are not transformative or limited applications of those algorithms or ideas, and therefore fail to claim patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 . Marvell also seeks partial summary judgment on the issue of whether it is liable to plaintiff France Telecom S.A. (“France Telecom”) for sales of.allegedly infringing chips 1 sold abroad by a non-party affiliate, Marvell Asia Pte. Ltd. (“MAPL”). Because Claims 1 and 10 recite an application of an abstract idea, rather than an abstract idea alone, Marvell’s motion for summary judgment to invalidate the claims is DENIED. Because France Telecom cannot seek damages based on a third party’s infringement outside the United States, Marvell’s motion for partial summary judgment concerning its liability for the accused chips is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

I. THE '747 PATENT

The '747 Patent “involves methods commonly referred to as ‘turbo- coding’ for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.