Hussein

Hussein v. Barrett

Good Law
41 F. Supp. 3d 841·2014 WL 1911367·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65832
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 2014Case No. 11-cv-05317-JSTCalifornia3,195 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tigar, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Before the Court is Petitioner Sameh Hussein’s petition seeking de novo review of the denial of his application for naturalization filed November 2, 2011, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1421 (c). The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) denied Petitioner’s application for naturalization on December 9, 2010, for failure to satisfy the Immigration and Naturalization Act’s (“INA”) “good moral character” requirement, based on an allegation of tax fraud. Petitioner’s administrative appeal was subsequently denied on the same basis. After Petitioner filed for review of that decision in this Court, US-CIS stipulated to withdraw its allegation of tax fraud as a basis for denial of Petitioner’s application, but indicated its intent to continue to oppose Petitioner’s application for naturalization on the grounds of false testimony given during the application process. The Court held a bench trial on December 2, 2013. Having carefully considered the parties’ exhibits, testimony, trial briefs, post-trial briefs, and controlling legal authorities, the Court will deny the petition.

I. LEGAL STANDARDS

District courts are authorized to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.