Hairston v. Pacific 10 Conference

Good Law
101 F.3d 1315
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 199695-35309California4,255 words

Opinion

Opinion

101 F.3d 1315 1996-2 Trade Cases P 71,633 , 114 Ed. Law Rep. 771 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8710 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14 ,419, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15 ,209 Russell HAIRSTON; Frank Garcia; Jaime Weindl; Jovan McCoy; Kyle Roberts; Scoreboard, Inc., a Washington corporation; Team Spirit, Inc., a Washington corporation; Graham S. Anderson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PACIFIC 10 CONFERENCE, an unincorporated association; National Collegiate Athletic Association, an unincorporated association, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35309. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 6, 1996. Decided Dec. 3, 1996. As Amended Dec. 19, 1996. James L. Magee, Graham & Dunn; and Michael D. Hunsinger, Neubauer & Hunsinger, Seattle, WA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Richard J. Wallis (Al Van Kampen and John A. Tondini on the briefs), Bogle & Gates, Seattle, WA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Barbara J. Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-01763-BJR. Before: WRIGHT, HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge HALL; Separate Concurrence by Judge TROTT. CYNTHIA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.