CMG Financial Services, Inc. v. Pacific Trust Bank, F.S.B.

Good Law
50 F. Supp. 3d 1306·2014 WL 4922349·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145557
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2014Case No. CV 11-10344 PSG (MRWx)California9,765 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gutierrez, J.

*1308 Order GRANTING Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 55.) The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15. After considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

I. Background

On December 14, 2011, Plaintiff CMG Financial Services, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint against Defendant Pacific Trust Bank, F.S.B. (“Defendant”), claiming infringement of its U.S. Patent No. 7,627,509 (“'509 Patent”).

On February 6, 2012, Defendant moved to dismiss the Complaint on the grounds that the '509 Patent is not patent-eligible. (See Dkt. No. 11.) On April 16, 2012, the Court denied the Motion, noting that courts “are better able to evaluate patent eligibility after considering evidence” and issues that would be better determined through the development and presentation of evidence included “whether the process of the '509 Patent is capable of being performed with pen and paper, whether the process integrates the operation of a machine, and whether the '509 Patent claims have been part of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.