Forestkeeper

Forestkeeper v. Elliott

Good Law
50 F. Supp. 3d 1371·2014 WL 4803024·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135952
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2014No. 1:13-cv-1721 AWI JLTCalifornia7,729 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ishii, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RELATED ORDERS Doc. #’s 18,19, 23 and

This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq. At issue is a planned action by defendant Kevin Elliott in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Sequoia National Forest and the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) (collectively, (“Defendants”) to implement what the parties refer to as the Ranchería Forest Restoration Project (“Project”)). Plaintiffs Sequoia Forest-Keeper (“ForestKeeper”), Centers for Biological Diversity and Western Watershed Project (“Plaintiffs”) allege that Defendants violated NEPA during the decision making process by failing to “provide the Plaintiffs and the public with sufficient information during official comment periods to provide meaningful and informed comments prior to issuance of [Defendants’] decision to implement the [Project].” Doc. #7 at 2:13-15. Currently before the court are cross-motions by Plaintiffs and Defendants for summary judgment. Also before the court is the motion of Sierra Forest Products to submit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.