Carr

Carr v. Tadin, Inc.

Good Law
51 F. Supp. 3d 970·2014 WL 7499454·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180446
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 2014Case No. 12-CV-3040 JLS (JMA)California7,614 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sammartino, J.

ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND INCENTIVE AWARDS (ECF Nos., 43, 40)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Jennell Carr and Phyllis Sierra’s (“Plaintiffs,” or, “Class Representatives”) Motion for an Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (ECF No. 43), as *974 well as Defendant Tadin, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Statement of Non-Opposition (ECF No. 45), the sole objection to the settlement (Decl. of Ronald A. Marrón in Supp. of Mot. for Final Approval (“Marrón Decl.”) Ex. 1, ECF No. 43-1), and the Declaration of Compliance by Class Action Administrator Gajan Retnasaba (ECF No. 41). Also before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion .for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards (ECF No. 40), the Declaration of Posting of Fee Motion by Class Action Administrator Gajan Retnasaba (ECF No. 43-2), and Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Class Counsel’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (ECF No. 49). A final approval hearing was held on July 21, 2014. (ECF No. 46.) Having considered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.