De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc.

Good Law

56 F. Supp. 3d 1105·2014 WL 5390259·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149632

United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 2014Case No. 08-cv-03174-MEJCalifornia2,257 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mariajames, J.

Re: Dkt. No. 234

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Defendant CashCall, Ine.’s (“CashCall”) Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9. Dkt. No. 234. Plaintiffs have filed an Opposition (Dkt. No. 235) and Defendant has filed a Reply (Dkt. No. 238). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without' oral argument and VACATES the October 30, 2014 hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for the reasons set forth below.

II. BACKGROUND

On July 1, 2008, Plaintiffs initiated this class action lawsuit against CashCall, alleging violations of California’s consumer protection laws. 1 Dkt. No. 1. On November 1, 2011, the Court granted class certification in this matter. On July 30, 2014, the Court ruled on: (1) CashCall’s motion for partial summary judgment as to Plaintiffs’ First and Fifth Causes of Action; (2) Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to two of their claims; and (3) Cash-Call’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs’ Fourth Cause of Action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.