Ludovico

Ludovico v. Kaiser Permanente

Good Law
57 F. Supp. 3d 1176·2014 WL 3725720
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2014No. C-12-4363 EMCCalifornia12,580 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chen, J.

(Docket No. 61)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. 1 INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Julieta G. Ludovico, a nurse currently employed by Defendant The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (“TPMG”), filed the instant action against TPMG alleging claims for sexual harassment in violation of Title VII and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). Plaintiff alleges a single incident of a co-worker assaulting her and making a sexually inappropriate statement. In addition to her Title VII and FEHA claims resulting from this incident, Plaintiff asserts that she suffered a mental disability as a result of the sexual harassment and that TPMG (1) failed to provide her a reasonable accommodation in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and FEHA and (2) retaliated against her when she complained of this disability discrimination. Plaintiff also brings unrelated disability discrimination and retaliation claims arising out of TPMG’s alleged failure to accommodate a physical disability Plaintiff suffered as a result of a workplace injury. TPMG has moved for summary judgment on all claims.

For the following reasons, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.