Phillips

Phillips v. Colvin

Good Law
61 F. Supp. 3d 925·2014 WL 3867874·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107627
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 2014Case No. 13-cv-03533-WHOCalifornia8,902 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Orrick, J.

Re: Dkt. Nos. 15,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment in this Social Security appeal. Plaintiff Alonzo Phillips suffers from a variety of impairments and believes that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in several respects. Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s decision, however, and so the plaintiffs motion is DENIED and defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

1. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 14, 2010, Phillips filed an application for Supplemental Social Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Administrative Record (“AR”) 20. His application was denied initially and again on reconsideration. AR 77-81, 84-89. Phillips requested a hearing and appeared before an ALJ on August 3, 2011. AR 91, 111. During this hearing, the ALJ rescheduled the hearing date so Phillips could obtain representation. AR 72. Phillips retained an attorney and a second SSI hearing was held on November 2, 2011. AR. 127, 129. On November 15, *930 2011, the ALJ denied his claim for benefits. AR 17. On August 30, 2012, Phillips submitted a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.