EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Aruba Networks Inc.

Good Law
62 F. Supp. 3d 942·2014 WL 938511·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29746
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2014Case No. 12-cv-01011-JSTCalifornia8,890 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tigar, J.

*947 REVISED ORDER CONSTRUING AND DETERMINING VALIDITY OF CLAIMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 5,592,491

On May 10, 2013, the Court held a hearing for the purpose of construing disputed terms in the claims of United States Patent No. 5,592,491. ECF No. 711. At that hearing, the Court requested further briefing on issues regarding the invalidity of two of the claims of the patent. 1 The parties provided that supplemental briefing on May 24, May 31, and, at Defendants’ request, on July 3, 2013, at which point the Court took the matter under submission. ECF Nos. 722, 724, 728, & 746.

After consideration of the arguments and evidence presented by the parties, and the relevant portions of the record, the Court issued an order construing the terms and determining that claims 1 and 13 were invalid. Order Construing and Determining Validity of Claims of United States Patent No. 5,592,491 (“Claim Construction Order”), ECF No. 748, 2013 WL 3455631 , 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95003 (N.D.Cal. July 8, 2013). In February 2014, the Court granted EON’s motion to reconsider the Court’s invalidity determination and clarify its construction of the “modem communicatively coupled” term. Order Granting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.