M. G. v. Metropolitan Interpreters & Translators, Inc.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants Metropolitan Interpreters and Translators, Inc. (“Metropolitan”) and J. C., R. P., M. L„ B. A. and C. G. (the “Individual Defendants”) move for partial summary judgment on the claims arising under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (“EPPA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2002 (1), (2), and (3), and the punitive damages claim. Plaintiffs M. G., F. M., L. A., J. M., L. G., F. B„ M. N„ R. G„ L. S., E. R„ M. D., M. T., E. S., and L. P. oppose the motion and separately move for summary judgment on the issue of whether Metropolitan and the Individual Defendants violated various provisions of EPPA. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants summary judgment in favor of defendants R. P., M. L., B. A. and C. G. on the EPPA and punitive damages claim and denies Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on these claims; grants summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs on the EPPA claims asserted against Metropolitan and J. C. and denies Metropolitan and J. C.’s motion for summary judgment on these claims; and…