96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8744, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,455 Dollard McGann Barry A. Bragger Peter Gershon Steven G. Cooperman, M.D. William S. Atherton Irving Scher Michael Patitucci, Jr. J. Floyd Johnson Schulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Becker v. Ernst & Young

Good Law
102 F.3d 390
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 199695-55925California5,057 words

Opinion

Opinion

102 F.3d 390 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8744 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,455 Dollard McGANN; Barry A. Bragger; Peter Gershon; Steven G. Cooperman, M.D.; William S. Atherton; Irving Scher; Michael Patitucci, Jr.; J. Floyd Johnson; Schulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Becker, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ERNST & YOUNG, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 95-55925. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1996. Decided Sept. 9, 1996. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Dec. 4, 1996. * Leonard B. Simon, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach, San Diego, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Miles N. Ruthberg, Latham & Watkins, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee. Richard H. Walker, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Alicemarie H. Stotler, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-00814-AHS. Before: FLETCHER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, ** Judge, United States Court of International Trade. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiff securities investors appeal the grant of judgment on the pleadings for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.