Minkler

Minkler v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
65 F. Supp. 3d 810·2014 WL 4100613·84 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 459·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116169
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2014Case No. 5:13-CV-05332-EJDCalifornia4,561 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Davila, J.

[Re: Docket No. 24]

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

Presently before the Court in this putative class action suit is Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Nancy Romine Minkler’s (“Plaintiff’) Complaint. See Docket Item No. 24. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7 — 1(b), this matter was taken under submission without oral argument. After a careful examination of the parties’ papers, for the reasons stated below, the court will grant Defendant’s motion.

*814 II. BACKGROUND

On June 11, 2012, former Apple executive Scott Forstall announced the launch of Apple Maps, a navigational application that could perform on any device running the then-latest version of Apple’s mobile operating system (iOS 6). Compl. ¶ 2, Docket Item No. 1. Apple released the iPhone 5, which used the new iOS 6 and included Apple Maps, on September 21, 2012. Id. ¶ 17. Apple Maps proved to be underdeveloped and lacking the amount of data necessary to provide consistently accurate mapping. Id. ¶ 3. Consumers complained that the application mislabeled landmarks, streets, and addresses, and led them to inaccurate locations. Id. ¶¶ 31-32. In response, on September 25,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.