In Re the Exxon Valdez. Gilbert G. Allen, Jr. Steven H. Alley Merlin M. Anahonak Mickey Anahonak Ronald G. Cameron Bart Evich Allen D. Hughes Keith Gain Henry Gain Barrett J. Gribble Shirley K. Gribble Ralph W. Hatch Natlie Kvasnikoff Wally Kvasnikoff Thomas B. Tressler v. Exxon Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation Exxon Shipping Co., a Delaware Corporation, in Re the Exxon Valdez. Rosemarie C. Abad David Akin Jovito G. Balce Al Curry v. Exxon Corp., a New Jersey Corp. Exxon Shipping Co., a Delaware Corp.

Good Law
102 F.3d 429·96 Daily Journal DAR 14861·36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 964·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 32231·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8961
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 199694-35650California2,281 words

Opinion

Opinion

102 F.3d 429 1997 A.M.C. 2700 , 36 Fed.R.Serv.3d 964 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8961 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9144 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14 ,861 In re The EXXON VALDEZ. Gilbert G. ALLEN, Jr.; Steven H. Alley; Merlin M. Anahonak; Mickey Anahonak; Ronald G. Cameron; Bart Evich; Allen D. Hughes; Keith Gain; Henry Gain; Barrett J. Gribble; Shirley K. Gribble; Ralph W. Hatch; Natlie Kvasnikoff; Wally Kvasnikoff; Thomas B. Tressler, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EXXON CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation; Exxon Shipping Co., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. In re The EXXON VALDEZ. Rosemarie C. ABAD; David Akin; Jovito G. Balce; Al Curry, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EXXON CORP., a New Jersey Corp.; Exxon Shipping Co., a Delaware Corp., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-35650, 94-35671. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1996. Decided Dec. 12, 1996. 1 Suzanne C. Etpison, Bixby, Bowan & Gerry, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. 2 Randall Scarlett, Brown, Monzione, Fabbro, Zakaria & Scarlett, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. 3 Kevin M. Harr and John F. Daum, O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, CA, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.