Zetwick

Zetwick v. County of Yolo

Good Law
66 F. Supp. 3d 1274·2014 WL 5797180·125 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 339·98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,191·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157154
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 2014No. 12-CV-02486California6,257 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nunley, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Yolo County, Edward G. Prieto, and DOES 1-50’s (collectively hereinafter referred to as “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. *1277 14.) Plaintiff Victoria Zetwiek (“Plaintiff’) opposes Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 19.) The Court has carefully considered the arguments raised by both parties. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Victoria Zetwiek initiated this case on October 3, 2012, alleging sexual harassment under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.) (“Title VII”) against Defendant County of Yolo and DOES 1-50, sexual harassment under the California Fair Employment Housing Act (Cal. Gov.Code § 12900 et seq.) (“FEHA”) against all Defendants, and failure to prevent sexual harassment under the FEHA (Cal. Gov.Code § 12940(k)) against Defendant County of Yolo and DOES 1-50. 1 (Complaint, ECF No. 1.) In her complaint, Plaintiff alleges that, during the course of her 14 year employment as a correctional officer with the Yolo County’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.