Langan

Langan v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Good Law
69 F. Supp. 3d 965·2014 WL 4744790·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134110
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 2014Case No. 13-cv-04994-JSTCalifornia9,204 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tigar, J.

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS, MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, AND MOTION TO STRIKE

Re: ECF Nos. 75, 76, 77,

Four motions are pending in this proposed class action for claims arising out Plaintiff Langan’s credit transactions. First, Defendants United States Automobile Association (“USAA”) and United Services Automobile Association Federal Savings Bank (“USAA FSB”) (collectively “the USAA Defendants”) move under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the claims that Plaintiff Langan has asserted against them. Second, Defendants J.P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services and JPMorgan Chase Bank (collectively “the Chase Defendants”) move under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the claims that Langan has asserted against them. Third, Defendant Verizon moves to compel arbitration as to the claims that Langan has asserted against it. Finally, the Chase Defendants move to strike the class allegations in the complaint. Langan has not opposed any of these motions. For the reasons set forth below, the USAA Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; the Chase Defendants’ motions are GRANTED; and Verizon’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Parties and Claims

Plaintiff Langan, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.