PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
69 F. Supp. 3d 1022·2014 WL 4757816·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136813
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 2014Case No.: 4:14-CV-1683 YGRCalifornia3,685 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rogers, J.

OrdeR Granting Motion of Defendant to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review

I. Introduction

As set forth herein, the Court Grants the motion of defendant Apple Inc. to stay this case in favor of inter partes review proceedings currently underway before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). (Dkt. No. 125.) 1 Roughly half of the claims at issue in this case are currently subject to inter partes review proceedings instituted by either the defendant or a third party. Thus, the likelihood of substantial narrowing of the issues before the Court justifies entry of a stay.

II. Background

A. Inter Partes Review

The Leahy-Smith America Invents' Act (“ALA”), introduced in 2012, replaced the former inter partes reexamination proceeding with an inter partes review process. Semiconductor Energy Lab. Co., Ltd. v. Chimei Innolux Corp., Case No. 12-cv-21 JST, 2012 WL 7170593 , at *1 (C.D.Cal. Dec. 19, 2012). Once a petition for inter partes review is filed, the PTO must decide within three months whether to grant inter partes review. 35 U.S.C. § 314 (b). The PTO may institute inter partes review only when it determines that “there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.