Successfulmatch.com

Doe 1 v. Successfulmatch.com

Good Law
70 F. Supp. 3d 1066·2014 WL 4954701·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140531
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2014Case No.: 13-CV-03376-LHKCalifornia6,746 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Koh, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this First Amended Complaint, a putative class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Defendant Suc-cessfulMatch.com (“Defendant”) for violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”). (“FAC”), ECF. No. 29. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 41. Plaintiffs opposed the motion. (“Opp.”), ECF No. 44. Defendant replied to the opposition. (“Reply”), ECF No. 46. Defendant also requests judicial notice of a complaint filed in a parallel California state class action case, lll-CV-2111208, against Defendant for the same causes of action. (“RJN”), ECF No. 42. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the relevant law, the record in this case, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss for the reasons stated below.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Plaintiffs’ Factual Allegations

Plaintiff Jane Doe 1, a Canadian resident, and Plaintiff Jane Doe 2, a Washington…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.