Ingrid & Isabel, LLC v. Baby Be Mine, LLC

Good Law
70 F. Supp. 3d 1105·2014 WL 5507669·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140553
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 2014Case No. 13-cv-01806-JCSCalifornia14,090 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Spero, J.

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 92,

I. INTRODUCTION

On April 19, 2013, Plaintiff Ingrid & Isabel, LLC (“I & I,” “Plaintiff’) initiated this action against Defendants Baby Be Mine Maternity, LLC (“BBM”) and BBM’s sole members and co-founders, Helen Tekce (“Tekce”) and Isabelle Gartner (“Gartner”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges multiple counts of breach of contract, one count of violation of the Lanham Act, and two California statutory and common counts of unfair competition. Defendants subsequently alleged counterclaims against Plaintiff for intentional interference with contractual relations, and intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic advantage. The parties brought cross-motions for summary judgment, which are presently before the Court and which collectively address all of the parties’ claims and counterclaims. Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment on its breach of contract claims and all of Defendants’ counterclaims; Defendants moved for summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment, on all of Plaintiffs claims and on Defendants’ counterclaim for intentional interference with contractual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.