Tric Tools, Inc. v. TT Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
72 F. Supp. 3d 1050·2014 WL 5681425·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156160
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 2014Case No. 12-cv-03490-JSTCalifornia3,566 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tigar, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 'SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Re: ECF No.

Before the Court is Defendant TT Technologies, Inc.’s (“TT”) motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. ECF No. 99. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will GRANT the motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Trie Tools, Inc. (“TRIC”) brought this action for patent infringement against Defendants and Counter-Claimant TT and Trac-to-Teckni k GM B H & Co., KG on July 3, 2012. ECF No. 1. TRIC alleges that TT’s Grundotugger machine infringes its patents for a pipe-bursting device: Patent Numbers 6,305,880 (“ '880 patent”), 6,524,-031 (“ '031 patent”), and 6,793,442 (“ '442”). All three patents relate to a device and method for trenchless replacement of underground pipe by splitting existing pipe and pulling cable through the existing pipe in order to perform the replacement. The '031 patent is a continuation of the '880, and the '442 is a continuation of the '031.

TRIC designed its device to be relatively lightweight, yet powerful, and to allow underground pipes to be replaced without the digging of trenches. Id; U.S. Patent No. 6524031, col. 8:13-25. This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.