Hill

United States v. Hill

Good Law
72 F. Supp. 3d 1111·2014 WL 5768779·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156683
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 2014Case No. 13-CR-00787-YGRCalifornia2,976 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rogers, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND GRANTING MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY

Re: Dkt. No. 22,

On December 5, 2013, the government charged defendant Kraig Hill in an indictment for violating Title 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), namely for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition. 1 On March 13, 2014, defendant Kraig Hill filed a Motion to Suppress and a related Motion for Return of Property. (Docket Nos. 22, 24.) Briefing on both is complete. With respect to the former, on March 28, 2014, the government filed a memorandum in opposition. (Docket No. 31.) The defense filed its reply on April 11, 2014 and the government filed its amended surreply on April 25, 2014. (Docket Nos. 36, 39.) On May 15, 2014, the Court ordered that an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress be conducted to resolve factual disputes.

The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on June 18, 23, and 27, 2014. Thereafter, the government filed a supplemental brief on August 15, 2014 and the defense filed a post hearing brief on September 5, 2014. 2 (Docket Nos. 57, 62.) *1113 The government filed a final supplemental response on September 19, 2014. (Docket No. 64.)

The Court has considered all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.