Moore

Moore v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law

73 F. Supp. 3d 1191·2014 WL 5830374·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158900

United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 2014Case No.: 14-CV-02269-LHKCalifornia6,609 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Koh, J.

ORDER. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff Adrienne Moore (“Plaintiff’) brings this Complaint, a putative class action on behalf of herself and others similarly situated against Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Defendant”) for tortious interference with contract and violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law and California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Compl., ECF. No. 1. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. (“MTD”), ECF No. 18.' Plaintiff opposed the motion. (“Opp.”), ECF No. 22. Defendant replied to the opposition. (“Reply”), ECF No. 24. Plaintiff requests judicial notice of Defendant’s license agreements. (“RJN”), ECF No. 23. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and accordingly VACATES the hearing on this motion set for November 13, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. The case management conference remains as set on November 13, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the relevant law, the record in this *1195 case, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.