Newton

Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc.

Good Law
75 F. Supp. 3d 1048·2014 WL 7183930·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173741
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2014No. C-11-3228 EMCCalifornia8,094 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chen, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Docket No. 238)

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Heather Newton filed a putative class action lawsuit against Defendants American Debt Services (ADS), Quality Support Services (QSS), Global Client Solutions (Global) and Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust (RMBT, or the Bank) alleging various violations of California and Federal law relating to Defendants’ debt-settlement enterprise. See Docket No. 1 *1051 (Complaint). Global and RMBT are the only remaining defendants after ADS and QSS defaulted. Docket Nos. 156, 199 (Entry of Default).

After this Court dismissed a number of Plaintiffs causes of action, and rejected certain of her legal theories, Plaintiff filed her second amended (and operative) complaint. Docket No. 206 (Second Amended Complaint). In that complaint, Plaintiff alleges that RMBT violated all three prongs of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) where it purportedly breached the terms of a 2009 Cease and Desist Order entered into between RMBT and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Id. at 17. Plaintiff also claims that RMBT and Global each aided- and-abetted ADS’s and QSS’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.