Vasquez

Vasquez v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n

Good Law
77 F. Supp. 3d 911·2015 WL 81939·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1143
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 2015Case No. 14-cv-04898-JCSCalifornia6,943 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Spero, J.

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, MOTION FOR REMAND FOR LACK OF DIVERSITY JURISDICTION AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

Re: Dkt. Nos. 6, 10,

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Jose Vasquez initiated this action in the Superior Court for the State of California, San Francisco County, asserting claims arising out of his employment with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (‘Wells Fargo”). Defendant removed the action to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 . Plaintiff now brings a Motion for Leave to File Fist Amended Complaint (“Motion for Leave to Amend”) and a Motion for Remand for Lack of Diversity Jurisdiction (“Remand Motion”). Defendant, in turn, brings a Motion to Transfer Venue (“Transfer Motion”). The Court determined that the motions were suitable for determination without hearing and vacated the hearing set for Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend and Remand Motion and GRANTS Defendant’s Transfer Motion.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Complaint

In his complaint, Vasquez seeks to recover unpaid commissions from his former…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.