Green

Green v. Bimbo Bakeries USA

Good Law
77 F. Supp. 3d 980·2015 WL 154540·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3245
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2015Case No. 13-CV-04414-LHKCalifornia4,996 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Koh, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No.

Plaintiff Dan Green (“Plaintiff” or “Green”) brings this action against Defendant Bimbo Bakeries USA (“Defendant” or “Bimbo Bakeries”). Compl., ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (“MSJ”), ECF No. 44. Green opposes the motion. (“Opp.”), ECF No. 48. Defendant filed a reply. (“Reply”), ECF No. 52. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the record in this case, and the relevant law, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

On September 14, 1987, Enten-mann’s/Orowheat hired Green in Santa Cruz, California as a route sales representative (“RSR”). Compl. ¶ 5. In 2002, Defendant Bimbo Bakeries acquired Enten-mann’s/Orowheat, and Green became an employee of Bimbo Bakeries. Id. ¶ 6. Green continued to work for Defendant until February 22, 2006, when Green left his position at Bimbo Bakeries. Id. ¶ 7; Declaration of Ronald D. Arena, ECF No. 44, Exh. A (“Green Depo.”) 28:11-13. Green then accepted a position at Sven-hards Bakeries. Compl. ¶ 7,

In mid-March 2006, Plaintiff alleges that Rick Roberts, the District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.