Morsa

Morsa v. Facebook, Inc.

Good Law
77 F. Supp. 3d 1007·2014 WL 7641155·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180968
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 2014Case No. SACV 14-161-JLS (JPRx)California3,866 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Staton, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Doc. 56)

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant Facebook, Inc. (Mot., Doc. 56.) Plaintiff Steve Morsa opposed, and Facebook replied. (Opp., Doc. 59; Reply, Doc. 62.) Having read and considered the papers and heard oral argument, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

II. BACKGROUND

On February 4, 2014, Plaintiff Steve Morsa filed a Complaint in this Court against Defendant Facebook, Inc., alleging Facebook has infringed and continues to infringe two of his patents. 1 (Compl., Doc. 1,¶7.)

Both patents are titled “Match Engine Marketing” and share a common abstract, which reads in relevant part:

(Id. Exs. A-B.)

The specifications, which are largely identical, state that the patents improve on prevailing internet advertising practices, which largely “followed] traditional advertising paradigms” at the time of invention — for instance, through the use of billboard-like banner advertisements atop webpages — rather than “utilizing] the unique attributes of the Internet.” ('337 Patent, col. 2:19-20.) The patents permit advertisers to target online advertisements only to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.