Boyd

United States v. Boyd

Good Law
78 F. Supp. 3d 1207·2015 WL 333344·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9363
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 2015Case No. 14-cr-00168-YGRCalifornia2,838 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rogers, J.

Ordek on Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Sever

The United States of American brings this criminal action against Defendants Shawndale Tyrone Boyd (“Boyd”) and Damian Sleugh (“Sleugh”) (collectively, “defendants”) charging defendants with: conspiracy to distribute marijuana (Count One), attempting to possess with the intent to distribute marijuana (Count Two); committing robbery that affects interstate commerce (Count Three); using, carrying, brandishing and discharging a firearm during and in relation to a drug crime and crime of violence (Count Four); and causing a death during the course of the crimes charged in counts 1 through 3 (Count Five). The indictment also charges Mr. Sleugh only with unlawfully possessing a firearm (Count Six).

Defendant Boyd has filed a motion to dismiss count one of the indictment, conspiracy to distribute marijuana on the grounds that the indictment did not contain an adequate statement of the facts underlying the charge, in which defendant Sleugh has joined. (Dkt. No. 65 (“MTD”); Dkt. No. 66.) Defendant Boyd has also filed a motion for severance on the grounds that his codefendant, Sleugh, made statements in recorded telephonic conversation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.