Bayol

Bayol v. Zipcar, Inc.

Good Law
78 F. Supp. 3d 1252·2015 WL 394515·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10596
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2015Case No. 14-cv-02483-TEHCalifornia4,374 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge

This matter came before the Court on January 26, 2015, on Zipcar’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The' Court has carefully considered the parties’ arguments, and now DENIES Zipcar’s motion, for the reasons set forth below.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Gabriela Bayol is a resident of Daly City, California and a member of Zipcar, a short-term car rental service. In order to use Zipcar, Bayol entered into a standardized Membership Agreement setting out the terms of her rentals. Under the Agreement, members must pay a fee of $50 per hour, up to $150, for returning a car late, in addition to the normal rental rate. Membership Agreement, Ex. A to Mot., at Schedule 2, § 1. Bayol alleges that she has returned a Zipcar late, and has accordingly paid the late fees set out in the Membership Agreement.

Bayol brought this putative class action to challenge Zipcar’s late fees under various California consumer protection statutes, including Civil Code section 1671(d), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), and the Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). Bayol argues that Zipcar’s late fee provision is presumptively…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.