Cambrian Science Corp. v. Cox Communications, Inc.

Good Law
79 F. Supp. 3d 1111·2015 WL 178417·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4415
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 2015Case No. SACV 11-01011 AG (JPRx)California3,713 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Guilford, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, DKT. NO. 379; GRANTING DEFENDANT COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, DKT. NO. 377.

INTRODUCTION

This case involves motions for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 in a difficult case. Defendants Cox Communications, Inc. (“Cox”); XO Communications Services, LLC; Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.; Level 3 Communications LLC; 360networks (USA), Inc.; Electric Lightwave, LLC, dba Integra Telecom; IXC Holdings, Inc, dba Telekenex (collectively, “Customer Defendants”); and Infin-era Corporation (“Infinera”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (“Defendants’ Motion”), seeking an award of the attorney fees paid to defend the case at least since the June 17, 2013 claim construction order. (Dkt. No. 238.) Cox filed a separate Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (“Cox Motion”) the same day, seeking the attorney fees Cox separately paid for the whole case.

The Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Cox Motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

In 2008, Plaintiff Cambrian Science Corporation’s (“Cambrian”) predecessor-in-interest contacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.