Perryman

Perryman v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP

Good Law
81 F. Supp. 3d 893·2015 WL 895638·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24296
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2015Case No. 14-cv-02261-JSTCalifornia3,485 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tigar, J.

ORDER 1) GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND 2) GRANTING MOTIONS TO STAY

Re: ECF Nos. 126, 135, 146, 150, 166

Currently before the Court in this proposed class action challenging Defendants’ practices of instituting lender-placed insurance (“LPI”) are motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Southwest Business Corporation and Beltline Road Insurance Agency. ECFNos. 126, 146. Also before the Court are motions to stay filed by Defendants Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC (“Ocwen”) and American Security Insurance Company (“ASIC”). ECF Nos. 135, 150.

I. Background

A. Factual Background

The Factual Allegations made by Plaintiff against Defendants Ocwen and ASIC are described in detail in the Court’s order on Defendants’ prior motions to dismiss. See ECF No. 100 at 2-7.

Plaintiff makes new allegations against. Defendants Southwest and Beltline in her First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 108. Plaintiff now alleges that around March 2014, “Ocwen entered into agreements with defendants Southwest and Alti-source ... to implement a new force-placed insurance program for Ocwen.” Id. at ¶ 8. Plaintiff alleges that, after the expiration of Ocwen’s force-planned arrangement with Assurant in March…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.