Brown

Brown v. California Law Enforcement Ass'n

Good Law
81 F. Supp. 3d 930·2015 WL 890564·60 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1998·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26054
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2015Case No. 14-cv-03559-JCSCalifornia3,240 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Josephspero, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No.

I. INTRODUCTION

Presently before the Court is Third Party Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Third *932 Party Complaint (“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on February 27, 2014. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED.

II. BACKGROUND

In this case, Plaintiff William Brown, who is medically retired from the Oakland Police Department, has filed a putative class action against his long-term disability plan, the plan’s sponsor, and the plan’s administrator under ERISA for denied benefits and breach of fiduciary duty. Defendants are California Law Enforcement Association Group Long Term Disability Plan (“CLEA Plan”); California Law Enforcement Association (“CLEA”); and California Administration Insurance Services, Inc (“CAISI”). The CLEA Plan is offered by CLEA and administered by CAISI. Defendants have in turn filed a Third Party Complaint against Brown’s employee organization, the Oakland Police Officers’ Association (“OPOA”).

A. Complaint

The dispute arises from the following alleged facts: In July 2011, Brown became “totally disabled” within the meaning of the CLEA Plan. Compl. at 6.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.