Does

Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Ltd. v. Does

Good Law
82 F. Supp. 3d 979·2015 WL 930249·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25970
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2015Case No. 14-mc-80328-LBCalifornia3,247 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beeler, J.

CORRECTED ORDER ON SUBPOENAS

[ECF Nos. 1, 3, 16, 21]

INTRODUCTION

The order of January 6, 2015 (ECF No. 15) 1 is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted in its place. The court denies the plaintiffs’ motion (ECF No. 3) to transfer this subpoena-enforcement proceeding to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. See gen *982 erally Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(f); infra, Analysis, Part I. The court grants the motion of Public Citizen, Inc. to file an amicus brief opposing enforcement of the plaintiffs’ subpoenas. (ECF No. 19.) The court thanks Public Citizen for its excellent and informative brief. The court has weighed Public Citizen’s concerns in ruling on the subpoenas. The court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument and vacates the hearing that is set for March 19, 2015. See Civ. L.R. 7 — 1(b).

The plaintiffs seek to enforce two subpoenas against nonparty Twitter, Inc. Those subpoenas would compel Twitter to reveal identifying information for the anonymous Twitter users who are the Doe defendants. The district court for the Western District of Washington has ruled that the plaintiffs may obtain that information. (ECF No.2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.