Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corp.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Illston, J.
ORDER RE: ATTORNEYS’ FEES CALCULATION
Currently pending before the Court is Sidense’s supplemental motion regarding attorneys’ fees calculation. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and for good cause shown, the Court rules as follows.
BACKGROUND
The Court has provided a detailed factual background of this case in its order from August 12, 2014. Docket No. 427. Therefore, the Court limits its background discussion to the procedural history and a description of the contingency fee agreements at issue.
1. Procedural History
On May 14, 2010, Kilopass filed the present action against Sidense asserting infringement of the ’751 patent. 1 Docket No. 1. On June 18, 2010, Kilopass filed a first amended complaint adding allegations of infringement of the ’757 and ’540 patents. Docket No. 6. On October 14, 2010, Kilopass filed a second amended complaint. Docket No. 38. On December 13, 2010, the Court granted in part and denied in part Sidense’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint, leaving six causes of action in the case: three patent infringement claims asserting infringement of the ’751, ’757, and ’540 patents, one false advertisement and…