Grigoryan

Grigoryan v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
84 F. Supp. 3d 1044·2014 WL 7745883·2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181916
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2014No. CV 13-07450 MMM (PLAx)California25,771 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Morrow, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On October 8, 2013, Gevork Grigoryan filed this action against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), Equifax Information Services, LLC (“Equifax”), and Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”) (collectively, “defendants”), alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., and the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”), California Civil Code § 1785.1 et seq. 1 On November 7, 2014, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. 2 Grigoryan opposes the *1049 motion.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

The facts are, for the most part, undisputed. 4 Experian, Equifax, and Trans Union are each “consumer reporting agencies” as defined by the FCRA and “consumer credit reporting agencies” as defined by the CCRAA. 5 The parties’ dispute concerns five credit accounts or trade lines that Grigoryan contends appeared inaccurately on credit reports compiled by defendants.

The creditor on two of the accounts was Bank of America (“BOA”). 7 The first account was a mortgage on a rental property Grigoryan owned for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.