Coppi

Coppi v. City of Dana Point

Good Law
88 F. Supp. 3d 1122·2015 WL 757241·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21452
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2015Case No. SACV 11-1813 JGB (RNBx)California9,480 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bernal, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This case was tried to the Court without a jury on May 20, 21, and 22, 2014. In lieu of oral closing arguments, the Court requested closing arguments by brief. Plaintiff Therese Coppi (“Coppi”) filed her closing brief (“Pl. Br.”) on June 14, 2014. 1 (Doc. No. 143.) Defendant County of Orange (“Orange County” or “County”) filed its closing brief (“OC Br.”) on June 20, 2014. (Doc. No. 144.) The same day, Defendant City of Dana Point (“Dana Point” or “the City”) filed its closing brief (“DP Br.”). 2 (Doc. No. 145.) Coppi filed a rebuttal brief (“PI. Reb.”) on June 24, 2014. (Doc. No. 146.)

On December 1, 2014, the Court held a hearing with the parties concerning these findings of fact and conclusions of law. (Doc. No. 150.) In a tentative opinion the Court distributed to the parties, the Court *1125 stated its intention to issue an injunction against Dana Point and award Coppi statutory damages. After discussing these issues with the parties, the Court ordered Dana Point to submit a brief concerning the issuance of an injunction, and ordered Coppi to submit a brief concerning damages. The parties filed those briefs on December 15, 2014 (“P’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.