Bledsoe

Bledsoe v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Good Law
90 F. Supp. 3d 901·2015 WL 736283·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24111
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 2015Case No. ED CV 13-02270-AB (SPx)California7,676 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Birotte, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

Pending before the Court is the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) action concerning the termination of Plaintiff Kanika Bledsoe’s (“Plaintiff’) long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(1)(B). (See Complaint, Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff seeks reinstatement of the LTD benefits under an ERISA-governed benefit plan (“Plan”). Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met-Life”) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (collectively “Defendants”) operate as the administrators of claims made under the Plan. On October 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, which has now been converted to a trial brief. (PL Br., Dkt. No. 38.) On November 3, 2014, Defendants filed an opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, which has now been converted to a trial brief. (Def. Br., Dkt. No. 44.) On November 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Reply, which has now been converted as a responsive trial brief. (PI. Reply, Dkt. No. 47.) • An Administrative Record (“AR”) was submitted on October 29, 2014. (Dkt. No. 44.) A bench trial commenced on January 5, 2015. (Dkt. No. 54.) Upon reviewing the Parties’ trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.