In re Conagra Foods, Inc.

Caution
90 F. Supp. 3d 919·2015 WL 1062756·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24971
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2015No. CV 11-05379 MMM (AGRx)California53,838 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Morrow, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra; 1 between Oc *938 tober and December 2011, the court consolidated several cases filed against ConA-gra under the caption above.

On January 12, 2012, plaintiffs filed a First Consolidated Amended Complaint. 3 On February 24, 2012, ConAgra filed a motion to dismiss, 4 which the court granted in part and denied in part on November 15, 2012. 5 On December 19, 2012, plaintiffs filed a Second Consolidated Amended Complaint. 6 On February 20, 2014, they filed a motion seeking an order permitting the withdrawal of several named plaintiffs and the dismissal of their claims; 7 the court granted this motion on May 5, 2014. 8 The same day, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. 9 On June 2, 2014, Con-Agra filed a motion to strike the declarations of plaintiffs’ experts, Colin B. Weir and Charles M. Benbrook. 10 The next day, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking an order permitting the withdrawal of named plaintiffs Bonnie McDonald and Phyllis Scarpelli and the dismissal of their claims. 11 The court subsequently granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.