Copelan

Copelan v. Techtronics Industries Co.

Good Law
95 F. Supp. 3d 1230·2015 WL 1413107·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39597
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2015Case No. 12-cv-01285-BAS(MDD)California5,082 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bashant, J.

ORDER:

(1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE (ECF NO. 56);

(2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 41); AND

(3)SETTING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES

Presently before the Court is a motion to substitute U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee Richard Kipperman as the real party in interest filed by Plaintiff Charles Copelan (“Plaintiff’) and Mr. Kipperman (“Trustee”) (ECF No. 56), and a motion to dismiss filed by defendants One World Technology, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) (ECF No. 41).

Having reviewed the papers submitted and heard oral argument, for the reasons set forth below, this Court GRANTS the motion to substitute Mr. Kipperman, and DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed this personal injury action in state court on'November 7, 2011. (ECF No. 1-2.) On January 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition. (ECF No. 41-2 at Ex. B; ECF No. 43-3.) 1 On May 25, 2012, this personal injury ac *1234 tion was removed to federal court. (ECF No. 1.)

In his bankruptcy petition, under “Statement of Financial Affairs,” Plaintiff was asked to “List all suits and administrative proceedings to which the debtor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.