Sassman

Sassman v. Brown

Good Law
99 F. Supp. 3d 1223·2015 WL 5255422·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120188
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 2015No. 2:14-cv-01679-MCE-KJNCalifornia13,104 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

England, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff William Sassman (“Plaintiff’) initiated this action against Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor of California, and Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), in their official capacities (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiff claims Defendants’ exclusion of men from California’s Alternative Custody Program (“ACP”), as authorized by California Penal Code section 1170.05, violates the Equal .Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Presently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and motions to exclude expert reports and testimony. ECF Nos. 50-51, 56, 60. For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and the evidentiary motions are DENIED, and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

Senate Bill No. 1266, which added California Penal Code section 1170.05, was signed into law on September 30, 2010. 2010 Cal. Stat., c. 644 (“SB 1266”). That bill provided for the implementation of the ACP, authorizing the CDCR to “offer a program under which female inmates, pregnant inmates, or inmates…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.