Videckis

Videckis v. Pepperdine University

Good Law
100 F. Supp. 3d 927·2015 WL 1735191·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51140
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 16, 2015Case No. CV 15-00298 DDP (JCx)California4,616 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pregerson, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

Presently before the Court is Defendant Pepperdine University (“Pepperdine”)’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 13.) Having considered the parties’ submissions and heard oral argument, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Motion and adopts the following order.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs in this case are Haley Videckis (“Videckis”) and Layana White (“White”). Videckis is a former member of Pepper-dine’s women’s basketball team who transferred to Pepperdine from Arizona State University in July 2013. (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Dkt. No. 22, ¶¶ 1, 47.) White is also a former member of Pepper-dine’s women’s basketball team who transferred to Pepperdine from Arizona State University in January 2014. (FAC ¶¶2, *930 47.) Defendant Pepperdine is a university located in California. (Id. ¶ 3.) Pepperdine receives funds from the federal government and from the state of California. (Id.) Ryan Weisenberg (“Coach Ryan”) is the head coach of the Pepperdine women’s basketball team. (Id. ¶ 5.) Adi (whose full name was not provided in the FAC) is an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.