Sidorenko

United States v. Sidorenko

Good Law
102 F. Supp. 3d 1124·2015 WL 1814356·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52452
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 2015No. 3:14-cr-00341-CRBCalifornia4,462 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Breyer, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

In this case, the United States government urges the application of federal criminal statutes to prosecute foreign defendants for foreign acts involving a foreign governmental entity. The government has charged Defendants Yuri Sidorenko, Alexander Vassiliev, and Mauricio Siciliano with five counts: (1) Conspiracy to Commit Honest Services Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 ; (2) Honest Services Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 ,1343; (3) Conspiracy to Solicit and to Give Bribes Involving a Federal Program, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 ; (4) Soliciting Bribes Involving a Federal Program, in violation of 18 U.S.C. .§§ 2, 666(a)(1)(B); and (5) Giving Bribes involving a Federal Program, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 666(a)(2). Two of the three defendants 1 move to dismiss the Indictment (“Ind.”), arguing: (1) that the Indictment fails to state an offense because the wire fraud and bribery charges do not apply extraterritorially; (2) that the charges violate due process because there is an insufficient domestic nexus to prosecute Defendants in the United States; (3) that the wire fraud and bribery charges are defective as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.