Warner

Warner v. Tinder Inc.

Good Law

105 F. Supp. 3d 1083·2015 WL 6777875·2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151970

United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2015CASE NO. CV 15-01668 MMM (AJWx)California7,813 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Morrow, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

On March 6, 2015, Billy Warner filed this putative class action against Tinder Inc. (“Tinder”), 1 and on March 11, he filed a first amended complaint. 2 On April 9, 2015, the court entered an order on the parties’ stipulation granting Warner leave to file a second amended complaint. 3 He did so on April 20, 2015, alleging claims for violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 51, et seq.; violation of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (“EFTA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1693 , et seq.; violation of California’s Automatic Purchase Renewal Statute. (“APRS”), California Business & Professions Code § 17600; violation of California’s False Advertising Law (“FAL”), California Business & Professions Code § 17500;. and violation of *1087 California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), California Business & Professions Code § 17200.

On May 20, 2015, Tinder filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint, 5 which Warner opposes. 6 Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the court finds defendant’s motion appropriate for decision without oral argument; the hearing calendared for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.